Comments on: Poll: Pennsylvanians opposed to card-check http://www.pa2010.com/2009/06/poll-pennsylvanians-opposed-to-card-check/ Your destination for PA's Big 2010 Election Races Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:52:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Quinnipiac: Specter/Toomey 45/44. [UPDATED.] - Moe_Lane’s blog - RedState web01.prod.theplanet.eaglepub.com 174.120.27.221http://www.pa2010.com/2009/06/poll-pennsylvanians-opposed-to-card-check/comment-page-1/#comment-2562 Quinnipiac: Specter/Toomey 45/44. [UPDATED.] - Moe_Lane’s blog - RedState web01.prod.theplanet.eaglepub.com 174.120.27.221 Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:02:44 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=3089#comment-2562 [...] think those numbers are bad, wait until Specter caves on card check to appease his new owners.  His constituents are purely going to hate [...] [...] think those numbers are bad, wait until Specter caves on card check to appease his new owners.  His constituents are purely going to hate [...]

]]> By: Moe Lane » Quinnipiac: Specter/Toomey 45/44. [UPDATED]http://www.pa2010.com/2009/06/poll-pennsylvanians-opposed-to-card-check/comment-page-1/#comment-1957 Moe Lane » Quinnipiac: Specter/Toomey 45/44. [UPDATED] Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:51:46 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=3089#comment-1957 [...] think those numbers are bad, wait until Specter caves on card check to appease his new owners.  His constituents are purely going to hate [...] [...] think those numbers are bad, wait until Specter caves on card check to appease his new owners.  His constituents are purely going to hate [...]

]]> By: Brian Klinehttp://www.pa2010.com/2009/06/poll-pennsylvanians-opposed-to-card-check/comment-page-1/#comment-1051 Brian Kline Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:25:52 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=3089#comment-1051 I think those numbers reflect wishful thinking among Republicans. Maybe I could believe them coming from a right-to-work sunbelt state, but not PA. I think those numbers reflect wishful thinking among Republicans. Maybe I could believe them coming from a right-to-work sunbelt state, but not PA.

]]> By: David Dianohttp://www.pa2010.com/2009/06/poll-pennsylvanians-opposed-to-card-check/comment-page-1/#comment-1038 David Diano Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:02:55 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=3089#comment-1038 Wow. What deceptive, loaded, leading and misleading poll questions."effectively ends the ability of employees to hold private ballot elections""violates the long standing tradition of the private ballot and will lead to more job losses in this recession due to the additional burdens on employers"ZERO questions on the pro card check merits. Nothing about how employers coerce employees to prevent unions.I'm sure the Unions or the Dems could run a similarly biased poll to show equally lopsided support for their side.The GOP is putting all it's eggs in one basket with the "private ballot" issue. The compromise bill is going to solve it (one proposal involved a mail-in ballot equivalent to a normal voting absentee ballot). Once this is "fixed", they lose their talking point. Wow. What deceptive, loaded, leading and misleading poll questions.

“effectively ends the ability of employees to hold private ballot elections”

“violates the long standing tradition of the private ballot and will lead to more job losses in this recession due to the additional burdens on employers”

ZERO questions on the pro card check merits. Nothing about how employers coerce employees to prevent unions.

I’m sure the Unions or the Dems could run a similarly biased poll to show equally lopsided support for their side.

The GOP is putting all it’s eggs in one basket with the “private ballot” issue. The compromise bill is going to solve it (one proposal involved a mail-in ballot equivalent to a normal voting absentee ballot). Once this is “fixed”, they lose their talking point.

]]>