The Washington Post

pa2010.com is proud to partner with The Washington Post in bringing our originally reported insider political news to a wide audience of decision makers and opinion leaders across the country.

Close it
advertisement
Whiteboard

Dan Hirschhorn's Blog

Dan Hirschhorn's Blog

pa2010.com Central

Specter vs. Sestak: The full statements

Arlen Specter and Joe Sestak on Thursday exchanged their first barbs of what promises to be a heated primary.

Below is the Specter campaign’s full e-mail to reporters, followed by Sestak’s full statement. pa2010.com Central has confirmed the accuracy of Specter’s statement, with the exception of the allegation that Sestak didn’t vote in the 1992 general election. Records show he did. We are still working to confirm the accuracy of Sestak’s statement, but previous available reporting seems to verify most of what he said.

SPECTER’S STATEMENT

Statement by Sen. Arlen Specter

July 9, 2009

“Congressman Sestak is a flagrant hypocrite in challenging my being a real Democrat when he did not register as a Democrat until 2006 just in time to run for Congress.  His lame excuse for avoiding party affiliation, because he was in the service, is undercut by his documented disinterest in the political process.

“Delaware County records showed that he voted in only 12 of 35 general elections (34%) from 1971 to 2005.  He did not vote from 1989-99, missing President Clinton’s 1996 election despite working in the White House at that time as well as missing the 1992 Presidential election.”

===============

Delaware County voting history for Joe Sestak — taken from official records on file at the Delaware County Office of Voter Registration.

1. Joe Sestak registered to vote as an Independent in August 1971.
2. He did not vote in any primary elections from 1971-2005.
3. He did not vote in these 23 general elections during that same time: 1973,74,75,77,79,81,83,84,85,87, 1989-1999, 2001, 2002.
4. He re-registered as a Democrat in February 2006, just weeks before he began his campaign for Congress in Pa-7.
5. In last Sunday’s Express-Times, Sestak said he was the only ‘real Democrat’ in the race.
6. From an AP story that appeared in the 7/7/09 edition of the Phila. Inquirer: Sestak, the highest-ranking former military officer ever elected to the House, said he registered as an independent throughout his military career because he believed it is inappropriate for a military officer to be affiliated with a political party. He registered as a Democrat shortly after retiring in January 2006.

SESTAK’S STATEMENT

“We’ve learned today that Arlen Specter can abandon his party, but he just can’t quit making Republican swift-boat attacks on the integrity of Democrats who served in our military.

Like Colin Powell (who was also registered as an Independent while he served), I believe that military officers should be nonpartisan.  The military depends on cohesion and unity, and the defense of this nation must never be political.  I’m proud that I was an Independent during my 35 years in the Navy, and I was proud to register as a Democrat as soon as I retired from active duty.

Let’s be clear:  I voted for Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, and Barack Obama while Arlen Specter was voting for George Bush and Bob Dole and John McCain.  My question to Arlen Specter is this:  do you regret voting for George Bush and John McCain?  Why should Democrats support someone like you who actively campaigned – as recently as last year – for politicians with values like George W. Bush?

As for my voting record, Arlen Specter should get his facts straight.  Obviously, I didn’t vote in any primary elections because Independents are prohibited from voting in party primaries in Pennsylvania.  Arlen Specter claims I didn’t vote, for example, in the 1992 general election, even though voting records show that I did.  In other years – for example, in 1994 — the records show that I requested an absentee ballot because I was serving out of Pennsylvania.  And I also clearly remember voting at other times by absentee ballot, such as in 2002, while I was leading an aircraft carrier battle group in the war in Afghanistan.  Unfortunately – as multiple reports have documented – it is all too common for service members serving in our military to not have their ballots counted because they arrive too late.

It’s sad that after 30 years in Washington, all Arlen Specter has to run on is a negative campaign.”

July 9, 2009 at 6:51 pm

--Dan Hirschhorn

Tags: ,

comments

comments [5] | post a comment

  1. Julie

    Jul 9th, 2009

    True on the independents point, Joe, but unlike Colin Powell, you make it sound like you weren’t even sure which party you wanted to join until right before you ran for Congress.

    http://kdka.com/video/?id=58575@kdka.dayport.com

    (4:15-6:15)

  2. David Diano

    Jul 10th, 2009

    Joe’s exaggerations continue:
    His campaign website says:
    “Joe is a former 3-Star Admiral, who successfully ran for Congress in 2006, after completing his 31-year military service to our country.”

    31 years.

    Now Joe is saying: “I’m proud that I was an Independent during my 35 years in the Navy”

    So…..,

    Which is it? 31 or 35?

    Joe, “might” be trying to pad the number from 31 to 35 by using his years in the Academy (but 35 is a new number for Sestak, because ALL the press releases and bios I’ve read use the 31 number, just like his website).

    But wait, Joe registered as Independent in August 1971 and retired in 2005. That’s only 34 years.

    So, it’s IMPOSSIBLE for Joe to have been an Independent voter for 35 years “in the Navy” when he was registered as an Independent for only 34 years.

    Sestak can’t even keep his OWN story straight, let alone go after Specter with any credibility.

    NOW HERE’S THE GOOD PART:
    Specter’s statement makes NO mention about for whom Sestak voted. But, yesterday, I made some speculations about Joe’s likely Republican votes for President. I guess the Sestak campaign reads this blog and what I write (okay, that’s more than a “guess”).

    Anyway, Sestak must have been sufficiently concerned to JUMP-THE-GUN and try to get ahead the question by announcing his choices. However, this is where Sestak screwed up (as I expected when I taunted them with my analysis):

    First: he left out Nixon, Ford, and Reagan, and Bush Sr. elections.
    Is Sestak going to claim he voted for McGovern, Carter, Mondale, and Dukakis? (or admit he voted Republican?)
    Also, he mentioned voting for Bill Clinton, yet only refers to the 1996 election with Dole, and leaves out Bush Sr.

    Second: he is making assumptions about Specter’s votes. ” while Arlen Specter was voting for George Bush and Bob Dole and John McCain.”
    Umm… how can he say, in a declarative sentence, for whom Specter voted? (Sestak’s not big on facts.)

    It was revealed during the 2008 campaign that the McCains admitted at some party years ago that they didn’t vote for Bush Jr. (even though McCain campaigned for him). It is entirely possible that Specter did not vote for some of the people Sestak claims he did.

    Third: the ballot box is secret and sacred.
    Specter is NOT required to announce his votes. However, Sestak has NOW opened himself up by not only announcing his votes, but by his obvious omissions.
    With Sestak’s unusually sparse voting record, he did manage to vote in almost all the Presidential elections. 1972 (Nixon/McGovern) 1976 (Carter/Ford) 1980 (Carter/Reagan) (skipped 1984)
    1988 (Bush/Dukakis) 1992(Bush/Clinton)
    But, since Sestak opened his own can of worms, by declaring his votes, as attempted proof of his own bona fides, he’s got little excuse not to go “full Monty” with the rest.
    Sestak voting for Nixon and Reagan and Bush Sr. seems very likely considering their strong military stances.

    Of course, we have only Sestak’s “word” that he voted for Clinton, Gore, Kerry and Obama. Sestak’s “word” plus bus fare is worth bus fare.

    This is funny:
    “It’s sad that after 30 years in Washington, all Arlen Specter has to run on is a negative campaign.”
    Sestak should really send the Webster’s Dictionary people his picture to put next to the word “hypocrite”.

    (The Specter campaign can use that one too!)

  3. KJM

    Jul 10th, 2009

    (Toomey supporter, laughing giddily)

  4. David Diano

    Jul 10th, 2009

    KJM-
    Exactly. The only people supporting Sestak are

    1) the people on the Left that are too consumed by past hate of Specter that they can see through Sestak and how costly this primary will be for the Dems overall Senate total

    2) the Toomey supporters that KNOW Sestak hurts the Dems and helps the GOP.

  5. Lee Levan

    Jul 11th, 2009

    David

    and 3) me and lots of others.

    KJM

    Enjoy it now. You won’t be laughing after the general election in 2010.

Leave a Reply


- will not be published