<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ideology matters</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pa2010.com/2009/08/ideology-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pa2010.com/2009/08/ideology-matters/</link> <description>Your destination for PA&#039;s Big 2010 Election Races</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:45:44 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: josh</title><link>http://www.pa2010.com/2009/08/ideology-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-2359</link> <dc:creator>josh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:07:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=3863#comment-2359</guid> <description>This from the same people and party that only a few years ago told us that democrats should just vote to confirm Bush&#039;s judicial appointments because it was his right to appoint them. Find it hard to take the article seriously.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This from the same people and party that only a few years ago told us that democrats should just vote to confirm Bush&#8217;s judicial appointments because it was his right to appoint them. Find it hard to take the article seriously.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Diano</title><link>http://www.pa2010.com/2009/08/ideology-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-2352</link> <dc:creator>David Diano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:19:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=3863#comment-2352</guid> <description>Nunk-
When Joe Employer lies about qualified black people applying, and is actually denying them employment because he&#039;s a racist, what should the government do?
To pretend that employers (in some areas) don&#039;t routinely discriminate based on race, gender, etc. requires some significant and deliberate effort.How about when Joe Employer runs a factory that uses unskilled labor? If 30% of the town is black the factory should have somewhere in the 25%-35% range of black employees. If it&#039;s 1 out of 100, there&#039;s some serious discrimination going on.When cops stop 10 times as many black motorists as white motorists, there&#039;s reason to investigate why.I realize that the GOP misses the good old days when blacks sat at the back of the bus, and whites sat at the lunch counters. Those days are gone. And if the GOP keeps up this support of institutionalized bigotry, it will soon follow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nunk-<br
/> When Joe Employer lies about qualified black people applying, and is actually denying them employment because he&#8217;s a racist, what should the government do?<br
/> To pretend that employers (in some areas) don&#8217;t routinely discriminate based on race, gender, etc. requires some significant and deliberate effort.</p><p> How about when Joe Employer runs a factory that uses unskilled labor? If 30% of the town is black the factory should have somewhere in the 25%-35% range of black employees. If it&#8217;s 1 out of 100, there&#8217;s some serious discrimination going on.</p><p>When cops stop 10 times as many black motorists as white motorists, there&#8217;s reason to investigate why.</p><p>I realize that the GOP misses the good old days when blacks sat at the back of the bus, and whites sat at the lunch counters. Those days are gone. And if the GOP keeps up this support of institutionalized bigotry, it will soon follow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nunk</title><link>http://www.pa2010.com/2009/08/ideology-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-2349</link> <dc:creator>Nunk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:29:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=3863#comment-2349</guid> <description>Diano, you&#039;re a left-wing nutbag who has drunk deeply of the Kool-Aid. How can you possibly enforce affirmative action, or otherwise make it meaningful, without quotas in place?Uncle Sam to Joe Employer: &quot;You&#039;re not instituting affirmative action.&quot;Joe Employer: &quot;Yes, I am.&quot;Uncle Sam: &quot;No, you aren&#039;t. You have 100 employees, and only one is black.&quot;Joe Employer. &quot;Well, no qualified black people applied.&quot;Uncle Sam: &quot;Bull****.  Here&#039;s what were going to do. next time we check up on you, you better have hired three more black people.&quot;That&#039;s how you enforce affirmative action, otherwise,  there&#039;s no point in even bothering implementing affirmative action as a policy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diano, you&#8217;re a left-wing nutbag who has drunk deeply of the Kool-Aid. How can you possibly enforce affirmative action, or otherwise make it meaningful, without quotas in place?</p><p>Uncle Sam to Joe Employer: &#8220;You&#8217;re not instituting affirmative action.&#8221;</p><p>Joe Employer: &#8220;Yes, I am.&#8221;</p><p>Uncle Sam: &#8220;No, you aren&#8217;t. You have 100 employees, and only one is black.&#8221;</p><p>Joe Employer. &#8220;Well, no qualified black people applied.&#8221;</p><p>Uncle Sam: &#8220;Bull****.  Here&#8217;s what were going to do. next time we check up on you, you better have hired three more black people.&#8221;</p><p>That&#8217;s how you enforce affirmative action, otherwise,  there&#8217;s no point in even bothering implementing affirmative action as a policy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Diano</title><link>http://www.pa2010.com/2009/08/ideology-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-2340</link> <dc:creator>David Diano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:51:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=3863#comment-2340</guid> <description>Dredd Scott decision: wrong
no prayer in school: correct
woman&#039;s right to choose: correctaffirmative action to PREVENT institutionalize discrimination is not &quot;racial quotas&quot;. The racial quotas argument was developed by racists to preserve white supremacy. Please find an argument with a better pedigree.Consent is not as strong as you imply. It merely means to have no strong objection that would disqualify the applicant. You can consent to things that you neither hardily support nor vigorously object to. That&#039;s the problem with the extreme right-wingers. They&#039;re incapable of recognizing the middle ground.Qualifications should not be the sole criteria, as there may be other reasons for the objection. For example, Robert Bork was completely nuts and out of touch with responsible judicial thought. Clarence Thomas was so minimal in his qualifications that he should have been dismisses as it would be difficult to swing a cat in a freshman law school classroom without hitting a better jurist.Sotomayor is immensely qualified. An ALL-white, ALL-male court is INCAPABLE of understanding the Constitutional protections, because they haven&#039;t been part of a group that needed protecting and can&#039;t deeply understand the small ways in which bigots chip away at the rights of minorities.Peggy- If this is the best you&#039;ve got, you might as well drop out of the race now. You have fundamental misunderstandings of basic functions of government.
Pennsylvania rejected Bush, Rick Santorum, John McCain and Sarah Palin for good reasons.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dredd Scott decision: wrong<br
/> no prayer in school: correct<br
/> woman&#8217;s right to choose: correct</p><p>affirmative action to PREVENT institutionalize discrimination is not &#8220;racial quotas&#8221;. The racial quotas argument was developed by racists to preserve white supremacy. Please find an argument with a better pedigree.</p><p>Consent is not as strong as you imply. It merely means to have no strong objection that would disqualify the applicant. You can consent to things that you neither hardily support nor vigorously object to. That&#8217;s the problem with the extreme right-wingers. They&#8217;re incapable of recognizing the middle ground.</p><p>Qualifications should not be the sole criteria, as there may be other reasons for the objection. For example, Robert Bork was completely nuts and out of touch with responsible judicial thought. Clarence Thomas was so minimal in his qualifications that he should have been dismisses as it would be difficult to swing a cat in a freshman law school classroom without hitting a better jurist.</p><p>Sotomayor is immensely qualified. An ALL-white, ALL-male court is INCAPABLE of understanding the Constitutional protections, because they haven&#8217;t been part of a group that needed protecting and can&#8217;t deeply understand the small ways in which bigots chip away at the rights of minorities.</p><p>Peggy- If this is the best you&#8217;ve got, you might as well drop out of the race now. You have fundamental misunderstandings of basic functions of government.<br
/> Pennsylvania rejected Bush, Rick Santorum, John McCain and Sarah Palin for good reasons.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chimesy</title><link>http://www.pa2010.com/2009/08/ideology-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-2331</link> <dc:creator>Chimesy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:46:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=3863#comment-2331</guid> <description>So what the heck is her point?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what the heck is her point?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/22 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk

Served from: www.pa2010.com @ 2010-07-30 00:46:09 -->