Adam Schwartzbaum's Blog
Adam Schwartzbaum's Blog
The In-Specter
send to a friend | print | comment
The problem with ‘The Real Arlen Specter’
Arlen Specter is doing a good job of controlling the political conversation now. But what will happen when his opponents’ commercials begin blanketing the airwaves in the run-up to the primary? Democrat Joe Sestak and Republican Pat Toomey will certainly put Specter’s trustworthiness on the line. They will run hard-hitting ads questioning his integrity, like the one above. Specter will be called to task to explain his record.
Can Specter pull off a victory if the conversation is about Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill? Specter is going to have to address these votes and these moments at some point, but every minute he talks about his past, he loses control over what he needs the conversation to be about—his promised bright future as a Democratic Party darling.
I almost want to believe in him. Here he is at 79 years old, having beaten back a host of political opponents over the course of his 29 years representing Pennsylvania in the United States Senate and survived a dramatic bout with Hodgkins Lymphoma in 2005 that he was treated for a second time for as recently as July 2008. Coincidence isn’t quite causation, yet its not hard to believe that these near-death experiences may have jolted the Senator into deep introspection about his legacy. Perhaps President Obama’s election really has changed the way he thinks about his duties to the citizens of his state and his country.
I’d like to believe this narrative—but Specter is going to need to really convince us what is reasonable about his naked reversals on so many fundamental issues in such a short period of time. He may not get an unsympathetic ear if he can convincingly speak from his heart.
This may be Arlen Specter’s most difficult political test. How he explains his evolution from the positions that motivated his votes on issues like those listed below may determine whether he is he able to win the primary against Joe Sestak and the general election against Pat Toomey.
One thing Specter can’t do is ignore them. His opponents will flood the media markets with negative ads like this one to remind Democrats why Arlen Specter was their opponent for three decades. Then, even if he can beat back Sestak’s primary challenge, he will need to distract a majority of Pennsylvanians’ attention from the guaranteed barrage of negative attacks Toomey will launch on television and other media in the run up to the general election—an assault that will almost certainly be well-funded by a very pissed off—and still wealthy—national GOP base eager to exact their pound of flesh from this turncoat.
If Joe Sestak is able to make this narrative about “The Real Arlen Specter,” the senator must prepare a rejoinder sufficient to gain the accord of progressives like me.
——————————————-
FROM “THE REAL ARLEN SPECTER” WEBSITE:
10. The Real Arlen Specter worked to make sure companies benefit from closing down factories in the United States, voting for tax loopholes for companies who ship jobs overseas [S 1637, 5/5/04]
9. The Real Arlen Specter joined his Republican colleagues in voting for the largest education cut in history, which would have cut one third of education spending over seven years [H Con Res 178, 06/13/96]
8. The Real Arlen Specter has supported many of the most reactionary judges the Republican Party could find, including voting for Justices Thomas and Alito.
7. The Real Arlen Specter still defends his vote to make Sarah Palin a heartbeat away from the Presidency, saying she and McCain were “the better choice.”
6. The Real Arlen Specter voted to privatize Social Security to put retired workers and retirement security itself at risk based on the volatility of the market. [Vote #56, 4/1/1998]
5. The Real Arlen Specter voted against extending the assault weapons ban, putting these dangerous weapons back on our streets [Vote #24, 3/2/04]
4. The Real Arlen Specter has voted numerous times to cut billions of dollars from Medicare and Medicaid, once voting to cut Medicare by $270 billion and Medicaid by $182 billion in a single bill [HR 2491, 10/28/95, Vote #556]
3. The Real Arlen Specter voted against the Climate Stewardship Act, landmark legislation to fight global warming and limit greenhouse gases [S139, 10/30/03]
2. The Real Arlen Specter helped create this recession by voting for the Bush tax cuts for the richest of the rich—53% of which went to the top 1% of earners—at the expense of fully funding SCHIP for children, Medicare for seniors, and other necessary programs
1. The Real Arlen Specter voted for the authorization of the use of force against Iraq [HJRes 114, 10/11/02, Vote # 237], starting the War in Iraq, which is still going on six years after President Bush declared, “Mission Accomplished.”
November 7, 2009 at 6:18 pm
Tags: Arlen Specter














Karen
Nov 8th, 2009
Where are you David? Defend this record I beg you!
I think you need to find some redemming quality about Joe, he may be the better choice after all for a tough general against Pat.
Lee Levan
Nov 8th, 2009
Adam
Sestak’s campaign cannot be totally about Specter’s record. Sestak has to begin (it’s past time IMO) to define himself before Specter does. He has to start giving us reasons to turn out and vote for him; not merely why we shouldn’t vote for Specter.
Otherwise: 1) voters will stay home as they did last week; 2) Specter will tell the voters who Sestak is; and 3) even if Sestak beats Specter in the primary, Toomey will have a good shot at beating a wounded Sestak having no clear identity in the voters’ minds.
Too much focus on Specter increases Toomey’s chances in November 2010. History shows that few candidates win concecutive primary and general elections by going negative in both.
David Diano
Nov 8th, 2009
Karen-
The REAL Hillary Clinton (whom Joe campaigned for in her Dem Primary) also voted for the “authorization of the use of force against Iraq”. So, how can Joe treat this like it’s a disqualifier?
Joe voted to give Bush a blank check, without timetables, TWICE.
Joe leaves out Specter’s opposition to Judge Bork.
Except for the 58-42 Alito vote, Joe’s site does not refer to a single Senate vote that occurred after Joe was sworn in.
I’ll bet you that for all the “bad” votes Joe is complaining about he never made a single call or wrote a single letter of complaint to Specter at the time about any of them.
I wonder how many times Joe has actually voted for Specter?
Lee-
Good points. Joe entered this race claiming his campaign would be about what he was running FOR, not against. Other than criticizing Joe for missing votes and campaigning on the taxpayer’s dime, Specter’s been running a fairly positive campaign and promoting Democratic policies.
Sestak’s actions serve only to weaken the party and our chances in November. Sestak is totally playing into Toomey’s hands. Notice how Toomey’s ads state he’s running against Specter and don’t mention Sestak?
Sestak’s actions effectively amount to a campaign contribution to Toomey.
Why do you think Clinton-arch-foe Richard Mellon Scaife has given $4,800 to Sestak?
rob
Nov 8th, 2009
Specter’s opposition to Bork is more than offset by his support of Roberts, which Sestak’s list also inexplicably omits. Specter has done much more harm than good when it comes to the Federal judiciary, and I for one am not going to excuse it. It just points out the total insincerity and untrustworthiness of this person who has been in office far too long.