send to a friend | print | comment
6th DISTRICT CONFIDENTIAL: Inside the Democratic endorsement fight
When state Senator Andy Dinniman (D-Chester) said last August that he wouldn’t run for Congress in the 6th District, it seemed like the Democratic primary was Doug Pike’s for the taking. There were no other challengers in public view, and numerous Democrats lined up behind Pike, seeing a clear field for the former Inquirer writer as their best chance of finally capturing the seat held by incumbent Republican Jim Gerlach.
Then, Manan Trivedi showed up.
Although Pike campaign insiders later said they saw Trivedi coming from miles away, the candidacy of the Reading doctor and Iraq War veteran quickly changed the complexion of the primary. Dozens of Democrats who had endorsed Pike early—in part because they thought he was the only candidate—had to decide whether to give the new contender a fair hearing. A prominent area liberal in state Senator Daylin Leach (D-Montgomery) got back on the fence. An elected official from Trivedi’s Berks County switched sides. Congressman Patrick Murphy (D-8) said he was staying put. The primary grew more heated, and while a prevailing narrative painted the Pike campaign as “bleeding,” it has continued to build on its early head-start, putting together a high-powered finance team and piling up powerful backers within organized labor groups. The Trivedi campaign has simultaneously built up its own base of support.
And all the while, behind the scenes, Democratic insiders have been mulling over their place on Pike’s endorsement list. Most appear content to stay there, and in reality, the individual endorsements mean far less than the local party endorsements that will be made early next year. But interviews with numerous party insiders reveal leaders and rank-and-file members alike increasingly agnostic about their support for Pike. Over the course of the last few weeks, pa2010.com has identified about half-a-dozen Pike endorsers—a small fraction of his total—who are thinking of pulling their support from the man who remains the primary front-runner. Some say they are waiting to hear more from both candidates. Some say they are just waiting to make a final decision. Others say they won’t be removing their names from Pike’s list of supporters, but will be functionally neutral in their actions. And whether they’re sticking with Pike or heading elsewhere, nearly all of them say they endorsed Pike partly because they thought he was the only candidate and were eager to win a seat that has evaded them this whole decade.
At the same time, a cordial but tangible behind-the-scenes lobbying effort has been spawned, as surrogates for Trivedi look to gently goad Pike supporters back onto the fence. The Trivedi campaign itself is officially abstaining from such actions, leaving it to supporters like Bob Roggio, last year’s Democratic nominee in the district and the first to endorse Trivedi. Pike’s campaign, for its part, appears to have put absolutely no pressure on its supporters to close ranks, engaging only in correspondence that is routine for any campaign and its supporters.
But if Pike hoped that Leach would be the last one to jump ship, he is likely to be disappointed.
“I probably came out too early,” Berks County Commissioner Kevin Barnhardt said recently. “I guess it’s one of those lessons to learn. I’m probably going to come out [soon] and go neutral. Maybe I should be a little more pensive in the future.”
Pike’s support appears to be softest in Trivedi’s native Berks County, and strongest in Montgomery County. Party insiders in Chester County seem to be the most conflicted about it, simultaneously impressed with Pike’s party outreach and hesitant to cross Dinniman, the most powerful Democrat in county politics and a Trivedi supporter. There is a growing perception that Leach’s decision has given Democrats further down the ladder some political cover to go neutral, though he waves off such a notion.
“What I am trying to do is walk a middle line, allowing both sides to play fairly,” said one Chester County insider who’s thinking of going neutral.
Reading City Council President Vaughn Spencer said he was sticking with Pike—for now.
“I owe it to myself to find out with these candidates are about,” Spencer said. “I haven’t changed my mind as of now … but after I speak to everyone that might change.”
His City Council colleague Marcia Goodman-Hinnershitz seems more likely to withdraw her support from Pike.
“I need to really rethink everything,” she said. “I didn’t know that Manan was running.”
No one seems poised to switch sides or go neutral in Montgomery County—though whether that changes if Lower Merion Township Commissioner Brian Gordon enters the race remains to be seen.
“I stick to my word,” said state committee member Joanne Olszewski, who’s also a vice-chair in the county party. “If my brother or sister were to run, that might be a different story.”
Several insiders have been contacted by Roggio, who lost to Gerlach by about four points last year and has served as Trivedi’s earliest emissary in the district.
“Manan has a lot of respect for all the officialks in the district,” Trivedi’s senior political adviser Daren Berringer said. “In the course of the campaign, if someone’s endorsed Doug, that doesn’t mean Manan won’t talk to him. We want to run an inclusive campaign.”
Pike e-mails his supporters regularly to keep them apprised of what’s happening inside the campaign, but none report feeling pressured to maintain their support for him.
“The on-the-ground fundamentals of this race have not changed,” Pike’s campaign manager Andrew Eldredge-Martin said. “Doug Pike will be the Democratic nominee because he’s the clear leader in fundraising and political support, and he has the backing of 12 progressive labor organizations, who know Doug will fight for working families. Manan’s campaign has not yet demonstrated a route to victory in the primary or an ability to be financially competitive with the Republicans in the general election.”
Some Democratic insiders who will technically remain Pike supporters will prove less valuable in practice.
“I will not apply my resources to help Doug’s campaign,” one Pike endorser said. “I’m going to see what Doug can do on his own.”
And even Reading Mayor Tom McMahon, who remains on Pike’s list of supporters, has been introducing Trivedi at local events, according to people who have been in attendance. McMahon could not be reached for comment.
One factor that handicapped Trivedi early among some insiders was his relatively late entry into the race. He was unable to formally declare until he was no longer under active duty status with the Navy.
“I think he should have gotten the word out earlier on that he was running, and I understand why he couldn’t,” said Reading City Council Member Donna Reed, a Pike supporter. “But he could have done that through surrogates and been more politically savvy about it.”
For his part, Pike has shored up his own support, in part, by consistently showing up at party functions and helping in party efforts. Chester County Democratic Party Treasurer Kevin Fitzpatrick, who says he’s sticking with Pike, recalled him working the phones last month for a close Downingtown mayoral race that the Democrats won.
“I was really impressed with Doug Pike and the fact that, on Election Day, he came down and spent several hours making get-out-the-vote calls …. for a race that was still on the bubble,” Fitzpatrick said. “He gets a lot of respect from me for that.”
December 17, 2009 at 12:00 pm
Tags: Doug Pike, Manan Trivedi, PA-6














Glorious
Dec 16th, 2009
This story just seems to make endorsements seem useless or more useless than they already are. If you endorse it should be under the terms that “this is THE candidate” for the district. No one could come in and change my mind, no leadership is better….
In this case all these people have let the system down and are causing insider strife which will only hinder the general election candidate.
David Diano
Dec 17th, 2009
It’s the classic mistake of endorsing before January.
In Jan/Feb 2006, Sestak suddenly dropped anchor in Delco and pushed aside Lentz and Scoles. It shows that you never know what’s going to happen until the last minute.
In the 6th, Pike’s trying to build up money and donors to overwhelm Trivedi. Trivedi’s trying to raise enough money to show he’s viable.
If a viable 3rd candidate enters, all bets are off.
In the 7th, Lentz got himself off to an early lead in endorsements and fundraising. The main objectives seem to be showing the money guys in Washington that he was a good fundraiser, and to raise a wall of money as a barrier against Vitali entering the race.
Then Gail jumped in and changed the equation a bit (from scaring off a challenger by raising money, to competing with a challenger and figuring out how much to spend for a primary).
The two biggest new “dangers” to Lentz are Vitali entering the race, and Sestak realizing that Congress is the only Federal seat he can win. Both are low probabilities.
I think the 6th and the 7th are going to be the closely watched primaries. I’m hoping the “rivalry” doesn’t cost the candidates a lot from their Primary funds, and gets the Dems to realize the party is vital by producing quality candidates.
The 6th and 7th will also be interested Hoeffel running for Governor and the SE being his base. This could be a high-turnout primary year for Dems.
In 6th Dem primary, Trivedi picking off Pike supporters?… | GrassrootsPA
Dec 17th, 2009
[...] In 6th Dem primary, Trivedi picking off Pike supporters?… [...]
GOP Geologist Walt Hufford to run for Gerlach seat… | GrassrootsPA
Dec 17th, 2009
[...] In 6th Dem primary, Trivedi picking off Pike supporters?… [...]
Bruce Bailey
Dec 17th, 2009
I’m not in the 6th, but I am a Democratic committee member in MontCo Area 4, which is mostly in the 6th District.
At our last Area meeting, both candidates showed up to say a few words and spend some face time with us. But only one – Trivedi – stuck around and went out with most of us afterwards for a beer to salute our outgoing Area leader. For whatever reason, Pike was nowhere to be seen.
This was the second time that we’d met both candidates – the first was during an Area 4 fundraiser in October. Pike and Trivedi both spoke there (and to most us, Trivedi was a surprise – we weren’t even aware there WAS another candidate going for the seat). Pike got polite applause; Trivedi, who delivered his standard “son of an immigrant” stump speech, plus an impassioned support of health care reform with a public option, got an ovation.
There is no doubt that head-to-head, Trivedi is a the more compelling candidate. Every single party member I’ve spoken with, if they’ve met both candidates, says that Trivedi is far and away the better choice, has a much better personal story and relates better to audiences and individuals.
Pike’s only saving grace is his personal wealth and fact that his campaign will probably be better financed. But that’s not necessarily a plus on the grassroots level.
Despite what Dan’s article says, I will be shocked if Montgomery County Democrats endorse Pike this spring. I expect it will either be an open race with no endorsement, or we will go for Trivedi.
Stop it
Dec 17th, 2009
This is such a farce.
Who cares?
The Democratic party is awful and has been moving further and further to the right since the 70s.
Why argue about who is going to sell out progressives?
Besides the only people who look at this website are campaign staffers, interns, and other “insiders”. Voters don’t follow this stuff and they aren’t supposed to. We let the money pick the “serious” candidates available and then the voters get some influence.
Anonymous
Feb 21st, 2010
GO Trivedi.