The Washington Post

pa2010.com is proud to partner with The Washington Post in bringing our originally reported insider political news to a wide audience of decision makers and opinion leaders across the country.

Close it
advertisement
Ten

Toomey rolls out the vets

Toomey rolls out the vets

Republican Pat Toomey during a Tuesday news conference in Philadelphia. At left, Afghanistan vet Kevin Dellicker. Photo courtesy of the Toomey campaign.

PHILADELPHIA—Republican Senate hopeful Pat Toomey took aim at Democrat Joe Sestak’s national security policies Tuesday, trotting out a group of military veterans to paint himself as the true candidate for vets in the competitive Senate race.

Flanked by veterans and their families during an afternoon news conference here, Toomey criticized Sestak, a former Navy Admiral, for opposing missile defense systems and supporting civilian trials for terrorism suspects. He also promised that, if elected, he would support legislation to make it easier for those in active service to vote.

“My record is clear,” Toomey said at the First Troop Philadelphia City Cavalry Officer Quarters on Tuesday. “When I was in Congress, I supported the types of programs and benefits that veterans deserve, and I absolutely intend to support those principles and those policies and those ideas in the United States Senate.”

In rolling out his Veterans for Toomey coalition, Toomey’s campaign began in earnest its efforts to make inroads in the military community—a constituency from which Sestak enjoys support thanks to three decades in the Navy. Toomey’s campaign has been increasingly confident that it can court most any constituency in the current political climate. And moments after he addressed supporters here, Sestak’s campaign was already pushing back, noting that Toomey in 2003 voted against a $1,500 bonus for troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan and that the former congressman has a 25 percent lifetime rating from the group Disabled American Veterans.

“Pat Toomey is out of touch with the needs of average Pennsylvanians,” the Sestak campaign said, “and they deserve more in a senator.”

Toomey called the statements by Sestak’s campaign “a very creative and ridiculous reading of my record,” noting that some of the measures referenced by Sestak were included in larger legislation for, he said, political reasons. The bonus was an amendment to a larger 2003 military appropriations bill that Toomey supported, and no other provisions were in that specific amendment.

“Now there are times when some of these measures are [used] as an excuse to undermine the fiscal stability of our country,” Toomey said. “That’s very bad policy. And we shouldn’t hold military and veteran needs hostage to wasteful spending.”

June 29, 2010 at 4:02 pm

--Andrew Thompson

Tags: ,

comments

comments [9] | post a comment

  1. Larry

    Jun 29th, 2010

    You don’t think it’s relevant to the story that there were a dozen Sestak-supporting vets outside this event protesting Toomey’s lack of support for veterans? You’ll have to catch the real story on Fox News (of all places), which actually bothered to stop and interview us.

  2. Dem Guy

    Jun 29th, 2010

    Welcome to the world of politics.

    Serving in the Navy for 30 years, and rolling out a group of right-wing supporters, are totally equivalent when it comes to being in touch with military/veterans issues.

  3. Veteran Bob

    Jun 29th, 2010

    Gee Pat why did you refuse to serve in the armed forces?

  4. TB

    Jun 30th, 2010

    People don’t serve in the armed forces because the armed forces are a joke. At the moment they are getting their cans kicked by a bunch of Taliban insurgents that are armed with decades old AK-47′s, travel on pack animals, and hide in caves. The AfPak region is hopeless. The sooner we leave the better. We’d get more bang for our buck on national security spending by installing full body scanners in every terminal in every airport in the country and doubling the number of TSA personnel in airports than we do fighting an endless war in Afghanistan. Right now we are pissing away $6.7billion a month on a war with no return on our investment in sight.

  5. [...] 2)     Pa2010.com: Toomey Rolls Out The Vets [...]

  6. [...] [used] as an excuse to undermine the fiscal stability of our country," Toomey said, according to PA2010.com, the only outlet to report the quote. "That's very bad policy. And we shouldn't hold military and [...]

  7. [...] [used] as an excuse to undermine the fiscal stability of our country," Toomey said, according to PA2010.com, the only outlet to report the quote. "That's very bad policy. And we shouldn't hold military and [...]

  8. [...] no, he didn’t actually say exactly that. This is how PA2010.com described the press conference (which, by the way was back in July) and the events leading up to [...]

  9. [...] that Toomey called such a bonus for troops "wasteful spending." The quote is from a June 29 article on PA2010.com in which Toomey defended his vote against the combat [...]

Leave a Reply


- will not be published